Will the CIO Lose the C?

Share on LinkedIn11Tweet about this on Twitter40Share on Google+1Share on Facebook4

co-authored with John Sviokla

There is some disturbing new data for the role of the CIO.  Thomas Wailgum of CIO.com says, “Given the… warning signs, it’s easy to speculate that the CIO’s role and the department’s sovereign power might be slip-sliding away.”  Half of our 2010 PwC Digital IQ Survey respondents said that more than 30% of the dollars spent on IT is done outside of IT.  Power in any organization usually follows those who can create new revenue and value, but our survey shows that 75% of the CIO’s innovation role is internally facing.

We think these different indicators point to a weakening of the CIO role at the very time when technology is reinventing marketing, and competition more than ever before. How can they be losing power and influence at the very time that they should be gaining it?  Smart phone apps are changing our expectations of mobile capability; h all major consumer brands have embraced social media as a new means to get their message out; healthcare firms are using onine video to tell its message to doctors and technicians alike; massive data mining is creating new insight, and data visualizations making these insights more usable — and the pace of change is increasing!

Could there be a better time to be a CIO?

We believe that one of the key problems is that the CIO is the only member of the executive team who is both a staff executive, serving providing support for all the other functions of the company, in a manner similar to the director of human resources, and also a line executive — akin to a vice president of manufacturing, because at many companies — banks, insurers, and airlines, the CIO’s job is to run the factory too.  We feel it is this dual role, of staff executive and line executive — a Jekyll and Hyde of the organization — that confuses the goals and roles of the CIO.  Simultaneously, most firms are seeing a whole new wave of technology affecting marketing, service, sales, and brand.  Everything, from iPhone applications to the incredible power of social media points to the fact that the CIO should have even more influence than ever — because technology is more important than ever to the creation of revenues and profits.

But, if the CIO is not willing to clearly explicate his or her role as the person who not only helps to drive down costs and automate all parts of the business but also as a line executive who runs the factory and helps to find new customers and serve them even more profitably — then their role as CIO will be split up — and the “administrative” tasks will be given to an executive who is not a C-level player, who is likely to report to the CFO or to the Chief Administrative officer — as internal staff functions ought to.  The line responsibilities will migrate to other line executives who have profit and loss responsibility — running divisions, product lines, or geographies.

What’s a CIO to do?  First, the CIO must articulate their contribution to both the staff and line roles.  Those CIOs who are involved in the creation of innovations and demand creation, are the ones who will continue to earn the C, part of their CIO title.  In our sample, only 25% of CIOs were involved in the creation of market-facing innovations.  The CIO who wants impact must help firms find new demand; serve customers better and create innovations.  It is these executives who will continue to have a seat at the executive table.

This seat at the table is important because we find that those CIOs who are involved in the strategic planning of the organization are more likely to drive business success.  Put another way, its hard to be a successful CIO if you are only an order taker and not a demand shaper.  So, now is the time to see how much you are contributing to growing the top line, and expanding the bottom line — unless of course you’d like to lose your C.

Share on LinkedIn11Tweet about this on Twitter40Share on Google+1Share on Facebook4
  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The CIO's Dual Roles - Will the CIO Lose the C? — CIO Dashboard -- Topsy.com()

  • http://www.sjponeill.wordpress.com SJPONeill

    Perhaps this is a sign that organisations are getting over the drag induced by many CIOs and their staff to organisational aims and progress. In the organisation (employing 10,000+) I have just left, the CIO’s organisation was renowned for failing to meet deadlines, making promises it could not keep, and generally holding the broader organisation back in the IT Stone Age in the interests of a zero defects, no risk (for the CIO staff) approach. Time and time again they proved that they just did not ‘get’ what the organsiation was about and where they fit into it…a real case of ‘tailwagdogism’…

    Perhaps it is now time to shift away from the industrial age concept of a CIO and move towards a more nichist approach where the roles of CTO and CKO are separate and where both strive to meet the needs of the parent organisation and not the other way round?

  • http://www.sjponeill.wordpress.com SJPONeill

    Perhaps this is a sign that organisations are getting over the drag induced by many CIOs and their staff to organisational aims and progress. In the organisation (employing 10,000+) I have just left, the CIO’s organisation was renowned for failing to meet deadlines, making promises it could not keep, and generally holding the broader organisation back in the IT Stone Age in the interests of a zero defects, no risk (for the CIO staff) approach. Time and time again they proved that they just did not ‘get’ what the organsiation was about and where they fit into it…a real case of ‘tailwagdogism’…

    Perhaps it is now time to shift away from the industrial age concept of a CIO and move towards a more nichist approach where the roles of CTO and CKO are separate and where both strive to meet the needs of the parent organisation and not the other way round?

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments()

  • Zach Sachen

    Related to SJPONeill’s comment - seems to me that a CTO is needed in light of some of the responsibilities outlined in the article. For companies that have a CIO and a CTO it’d be great to see how each company defines each role and the respective responsibilities… and which have succeeded and which have failed.

  • Zach Sachen

    Related to SJPONeill’s comment - seems to me that a CTO is needed in light of some of the responsibilities outlined in the article. For companies that have a CIO and a CTO it’d be great to see how each company defines each role and the respective responsibilities… and which have succeeded and which have failed.

  • Shahram Jalalinia

    In my opinion, CIO’s position and responsibilities should be defined in accord with nature of the business. If IT is recognized as the most significant driver to change your business, of course CIO as the hero of change should be in the executive board.

  • Shahram Jalalinia

    In my opinion, CIO’s position and responsibilities should be defined in accord with nature of the business. If IT is recognized as the most significant driver to change your business, of course CIO as the hero of change should be in the executive board.

  • Pingback: Links for April 4 2010 | Dallas Technology Strategy Consulting | Eric D. Brown()

  • http://www.keywordcommunication.com Amy Dean

    Great post Chris. In my role as a social media consultant, I find what companies are lacking is a Chief Integration Officer. Companies are cultured to work in silos. In fact, in some organizations, departments compete against each other. But success in new media demands integration, team work and discipline at a level that companies are simply not accustomed to. Should the I in CIO start to stand for integration?

  • http://www.keywordcommunication.com Amy Dean

    Great post Chris. In my role as a social media consultant, I find what companies are lacking is a Chief Integration Officer. Companies are cultured to work in silos. In fact, in some organizations, departments compete against each other. But success in new media demands integration, team work and discipline at a level that companies are simply not accustomed to. Should the I in CIO start to stand for integration?

  • Neeraj Sanghani

    In most organizations the CIO role as mentioned in the article spans from strategy to day to day operations. Unlike the CTO who for most part manages an engineering or product development organization, the CIO is managing an IT organization. IT organizations skills set and orientation is to manage day to day business systems and not do product development. In-line with what Zach mentioned, probably the CTO should take on some of the strategic role. In this case the “C” in the CIO role can be dropped and the new role (whatever it is called) reports to the CTO and focus on IT operations.

  • Neeraj Sanghani

    In most organizations the CIO role as mentioned in the article spans from strategy to day to day operations. Unlike the CTO who for most part manages an engineering or product development organization, the CIO is managing an IT organization. IT organizations skills set and orientation is to manage day to day business systems and not do product development. In-line with what Zach mentioned, probably the CTO should take on some of the strategic role. In this case the “C” in the CIO role can be dropped and the new role (whatever it is called) reports to the CTO and focus on IT operations.

  • AHSAN AZIZ KHAN

    with reference to SJPONeill’s remarks. I would tend to disagree. Most of the time, I have expereinced that business people are hiding their failures behind the IT. For example, I have seen that many time our product development has not done the due diligence on their new product which was missing certain vital elements. In the end I have seen them hiding their failure and putting blame on IT. Ohh, IT has not configued the system right. This phenoma they have repeated time and again.

  • AHSAN AZIZ KHAN

    with reference to SJPONeill’s remarks. I would tend to disagree. Most of the time, I have expereinced that business people are hiding their failures behind the IT. For example, I have seen that many time our product development has not done the due diligence on their new product which was missing certain vital elements. In the end I have seen them hiding their failure and putting blame on IT. Ohh, IT has not configued the system right. This phenoma they have repeated time and again.

  • Pingback: The CIO Role - Current Thinking for IT Leaders — CIOpedia()

  • Pingback: CIO = Customer Information Officer — CIO Dashboard()

  • Pingback: Are IT Leaders Also Social Media Leaders? — CIO Dashboard()

  • Pingback: Balancing the Centralization and Decentralization of IT Governance — CIO Dashboard()

  • Pingback: 2013: The Year of the CIO — CIO Dashboard()

  • Pingback: PwC’s CIO/CMO Roundtable with Geoffrey Moore — CIO Dashboard()